3 ms·
I do too. Nim is an antithesis to Zig in a lot of ways: memory safe, intentionally flexible syntax via UFCS, and extremely powerful macros. They do both fit in
by j-james 4y ago
I do too. Nim is an antithesis to Zig in a lot of ways: memory safe, intentionally flexible syntax via UFCS, and extremely powerful macros.
They do both fit in that better-than-C niche in different ways.
- synergy20 4y agosomehow nim just did not get the share of attention, I wonder if it's the name that is not intriguing enough? it's also so close to nix the packager on the naming part. so nim uses exception handlers for errors, how does that cope with real-time embedded scenarios? I had to use C for that as c++ has the same try-catch concerns for me.