4 ms·
I gave a thought of providing a description directly but then it was getting too messy, If you can suggest an alternate approach i am ready to try it out.
by anantshri 15y ago
I gave a thought of providing a description directly but then it was getting too messy, If you can suggest an alternate approach i am ready to try it out.
- andrewflnr 15y agoIt doesn't really work on iPad, if you're supposed to be able to open it like a tree view. I can get the mouse over descriptions by tapping, though. When I did something similar [1], I just put a summary right next to the folder name. Maybe it is a little messy, but I think it works pretty well. [1] http://andrewfleenor.users.sourceforge.net/fhs/fhs.xml http://andrewfleenor.users.sourceforge.net/fhs/fhs.xml
- anantshri 15y agolooks ohk. I will try modelling a new version on this logic. also try clicking on the arrow for opening the tree.
- andrewflnr 15y agoHuh. Expansion works now. I guess I was just missing the button. Sorry about that.
- jerf 15y agoThe tree controls just get in the way. There is not so much content here that it justifies needing to click 5 or 10 times just to see it all. When I first visited the page with NoScript, the tree was actually easier to see because it defaulted to fully open. I'd also consider just inlining the "details" too with a simple "dirname - details" scheme; maybe color them a little differently (I wouldn't even go nuts, just a dark grey vs. black will be fine, not bright red or anything). Unfortunately, you've gone through a lot of work to make the content on this page quite difficult to use :(
- mikle 15y agoI don't think an upvote is enough to show that I agree with you. Especially the last sentence. The info is very interesting, but I gave up after I opened the first tree. Another problem jerf's design fixes is that you have no way of telling which line has a tooltip and which doesn't, and coupled with the fact the tooltips take a fraction of a second to appear waste my time.