4 ms·
I'd add, this is not necessarily true in the future, because we have justices on both sides of the Supreme Court concerned about surveillance and privacy (most
by SamReidHughes 4y ago
I'd add, this is not necessarily true in the future, because we have justices on both sides of the Supreme Court concerned about surveillance and privacy (most transparently Alito, Kagan, Sotomayer), and that could be a majority in future rulings. This made the news in U.S. v. Jones.
- landemva 4y agoIf there is interest from State voters, amend State constitution to prohibit this. Probably people don't care about surveillance.