They could have used the SIL Open Font License instead. People in the open source world are often already familiar with it, and resources like tl;dr Legal are a

They could have used the SIL Open Font License instead. People in the open source world are often already familiar with it, and resources like tl;dr Legal are available for it. Their EULA is, in fact almost exactly the SIL Open Font License, but someone decided minor changes in wording were more valuable than standardization. https://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?item_id=OFL_web https://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?item_id=OFL_web https://tldrlegal.com/license/open-font-license-(ofl)-explained https://tldrlegal.com/license/open-font-license-(ofl)-explai...