> The reader is misled to think that evidence for the expansion of the universe is evidence that the universe began with the Big Bang Event, which is incorrect.

> The reader is misled to think that evidence for the expansion of the universe is evidence that the universe began with the Big Bang Event, which is incorrect. "Incorrect" is a needlessly violent word to use here when motte-and-bailey arguments are the heart and soul of popsci in $current_year.