> Second article Why does this guy claim that the potential input latency of a debounce implementation negates the latency caused by decreasing the polling rat

> Second article Why does this guy claim that the potential input latency of a debounce implementation negates the latency caused by decreasing the polling rate? This is such a typical non-sequitur I see in computer related topics and doesn't change my mind that mechanical keyboards are yet another gimmick mainly lead by charlatans. Also the fact that you can just set 99% of keyboards, even from 20 years ago to 1000Hz with a tweak.