3 ms·
As a dancer and photographer in my spare time, I've thought a lot about this too. I've written a couple of articles about it, though neither is as detailed as
by stevelosh 15y ago
As a dancer and photographer in my spare time, I've thought a lot about this too. I've written a couple of articles about it, though neither is as detailed as this:
http://stevelosh.com/blog/2008/04/shooting-girl-jam/ http://stevelosh.com/blog/2008/04/shooting-girl-jam/
http://stevelosh.com/blog/2009/02/how-i-shoot-dances/ http://stevelosh.com/blog/2009/02/how-i-shoot-dances/
- sravfeyn 15y agoBut, no more do we need these photography tutorials now that we have lytro :P (http://www.lytro.com/ http://www.lytro.com/). BTW, is that the Peter Norvig from AI-Stanford!!
- irahul 15y ago> BTW, is that the Peter Norvig from AI-Stanford!! Yes.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- sp332 15y agoIt's nice to choose the focal plane like in the demos, but it'll be more useful when I can choose the depth of focus as well.
- jeswin 15y agoI don't really think lytro is that big a deal. 1. The big advantage I see is that there is no need to focus, but auto-focus is becoming really quick these days. 2. I can't find a picture where I feel like changing the focused object after taking the shot. I focused on something because I wanted it that way. 3. Aside of the focusing, an SLR gives you way more control. Lytro however, is affordable and could still sell well.