5 ms·
Although the font did really try to nail its goal, I think Iosevka really nailed it. On top of that, somebody took some of what Atkinson did with their font, a
by DiabloD3 4y ago
Although the font did really try to nail its goal, I think Iosevka really nailed it.
On top of that, somebody took some of what Atkinson did with their font, and applied it to Iosevka, using its insanely powerful ability to be customized wildly, to produce http://thedarnedestthing.com/iosevka%20hyperlegible http://thedarnedestthing.com/iosevka%20hyperlegible
- moralestapia 4y agoFWIW, the font on that blog post is not Iosevka, You can find Iosevka here -> https://typeof.net/Iosevka/ https://typeof.net/Iosevka/
- einpoklum 4y agoI find the 0.5em character width reduces readability somewhat. YMMV.
- _emacsomancer_ 4y agoIt is an Iosevka.
- scubbo 4y agoOff-topic, but I think this might be the first time I've loaded a url including `%20` and had it actually render in my address bar as a space, rather than the percent-code. Is this something new in Firefox?
- riquito 4y agoIt's been like this in Firefox for quite some time
- 5350-uiop-1130 4y agothe irony of having "hyperlegible" in the title when the title itself is barely legible. using a tiny 11px grey colour font, the body text is borderline while the navigation text is almost transparent.
- IncRnd 4y agoMeybe they did that for their target audience to see that the font is legible.
- Razengan 4y agoUmm that website is barely legible, let alone hyper. Small, thin, spindly, faint, what the hell? (On Safari Ventura)
- DiabloD3 4y agoI think that was done on purpose. It's rather awful contrast, with the color choice making it worse, yet I can read it at 100% zoom when I would otherwise be unable to with any other font choice.