3 ms·
You have a point. Can you share a prompt with that level of specificity? Its fascinating to see this new sort of science of prompt engineering.
by jasonjamerson 4y ago
You have a point. Can you share a prompt with that level of specificity? Its fascinating to see this new sort of science of prompt engineering.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- kixpanganiban 4y agoAn example prompt for a recent image I generated: "skull::0.75 of a woman with long hair, ornate::0.9, hooded::0.7 robe::0.7, highly detailed::0.8, decorated, full body, standing in a mystical::0.8 forest::0.7, style of Aleksi Briclot, realistic::-1 photoreal::-0.7, --no water --no sky, --ar 4:5" Prompt aside, the final image took me about an hour to make, rerolling a number of times to get the composition I want with the base v3 algorithm, then upscaling and then remastering with the --test --creative --upbeta mode, and rerolling again until I got the final remaster just right.
- jasonjamerson 4y agoIt looks great, and there's definitely an art to prompting. But whether you created the exact composition as we were discussing still isn't solved for me. It's not full body, there's barely something that looks like a skull, and it's off to the side. It's a very interesting question that I think we'll be debating and thinking about for some time.