3 ms·
A few caveats: 1) While plenty are still in the wild, Intel Macs have been discontinued. OP already has an x86 build, and ARM64 is a unified future for all App
by washadjeffmad 4y ago
A few caveats:
1) While plenty are still in the wild, Intel Macs have been discontinued. OP already has an x86 build, and ARM64 is a unified future for all Apple devices. At least also get a $569 M1 Mac Mini from Costco or something. M1 Airs can be had new for around $800 at Microcenter.
2) That particular Mac Mini suffers from several design issues. Due to chipset placement, running certain USB devices from the rear ports will prevent Bluetooth from working and cause frustration with wireless peripherals and audio. It's a T2 Intel Mac, which was designed adversarially against security flaws, so it's got some quirks and performance issues to contend with that Apple has ended support for. The official guidance, for instance, for both displays not being detected on that model is "power cycle until they both appear". They also run unusually loud and hot, which means they can't be pushed as hard before they throttle.
The good is that an Intel Mac will inform better design by showing you the greatest % lows your app will ever experience. Because hardware mitigations weren't added by Intel until the 10th gen, they suffer from the poorest syscall and apfs performance.
- daviddever23box 4y agoItem 2 would definitely be relevant if one was testing Bluetooth device compatibility or multi-display functionality; for general software testing with a wired keyboard and mouse via HDMI and wired Ethernet (a testing scenario that minimizes any latency), it's not so much of an issue. I agree with the M1 Mac mini 8/256 recommendation, though it represents a plateau of performance that many of the remaining (and many) Intel macOS devices cannot reach. The M1 is faster, therefore perhaps not as representative of currently-supported legacy macOS-on-Intel devices.
- DarrenDev 4y agoThanks