3 ms·
> Are you seriously comparing a few bytes difference? The site loads more CSS from https://www.troysk.com/stylesheets/style.css https://www.troysk.com/styleshee
by lelandfe 4y ago
> Are you seriously comparing a few bytes difference? The site loads more CSS from https://www.troysk.com/stylesheets/style.css https://www.troysk.com/stylesheets/style.css
Setting aside that you're wrong (your style.css is 1.7kB, HN is 2.2kB), that small difference is kind of my point. Discussions of if a quick FCP is easy or not should be based on a typical site. Tiny, static portfolio sites ain't that.
> And hardly any JS? Can you even read code?
Your site's entire JS weight is below 50kB.
> How does it benefit? Have users reaction rates become faster than 1s on the web?
Right. That's why I said, "not that it would do much, being default fast"
- troysk 4y agoThe numbers are wrong.
- lelandfe 4y agoJS: https://i.imgur.com/C6ir5TL.png https://i.imgur.com/C6ir5TL.png CSS: https://i.imgur.com/sgmlnkF.png https://i.imgur.com/sgmlnkF.png Not sure what you're doing at this point. Are you trying to make the case that your site uses a lot of JS...? The site's entire JS package consists of LoadCSS, some ScrollMagic calls, and a Google Analytics tag.