10 ms·
That’s not the whole story. They didn’t reinstate his account because of another, medically unnecessary, photo of the kid in bed with his nude wife.
by unknownaccount 4y ago
That’s not the whole story. They didn’t reinstate his account because of another, medically unnecessary, photo of the kid in bed with his nude wife.
- emptyparadise 4y agoWhy is that a bannable offense?
- MerelyMortal 4y agosource and context? I think that happened in the U.K., and I'm not sure what their laws are, but in the U.S.A., as long as there is nothing sexual about it, such a picture is not illegal.
- noam_compsci 4y agoSource? I can’t find anything about this as an addendum to the story. Guardian, verge and NYT just end the story at “account still blocked”.
- ChoGGi 4y agoIt was a video and he didn't send it. He just happened to have it on the same phone. "the subsequent review of his account turned up a video from six months earlier that Google also considered problematic, of a young child lying in bed with an unclothed woman." https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2022/08/21/technology/google-surveillance-toddler-photo.amp.html https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2022/08/21/tech...
- lizardactivist 4y agoInteresting that Google can just browse through the photos on one's phone, completely at their own initiative. "Private and secure" - private and secure from other people. Never from Google. Never from the US government.