3 ms·

So would every other source ;)

• willis936 4y ago
  Not the news articles generated by bots that take in words written by humans then run them through a lawnmower. Now that's what I consider a reliable source.
• ekianjo 4y ago
  So why do we cite wikipedia like its written by a higher power or something. Wikipedia content is hardly difficult to hack in one way or another as proven times and times over.
  • leephillips 4y ago
    “We” don’t; those who do take at least a mild hit to their credibility.
    • antiterra 4y ago
      No one is citing it as a higher power, simply an easily accessed central repository. I didn’t fly to France to verify it as a primary source for a comment thread but I already knew Daguerre was an artist. This isn’t an academic paper.