4 ms·
There would always be companies donating to charities and advertising - just only the ones below the threshold. And the variety and number would be a lot more v
by collaborative 4y ago
There would always be companies donating to charities and advertising - just only the ones below the threshold. And the variety and number would be a lot more vibrant
Word-of-mouth would actually be what the mega corps would aim for in this hypothetical system. They would be forced to treat customers super nice and actually lose money. Consumers would win and competition would improve. I propose the increased number of competitors would actually increase the donations made to charities. It just wouldn't all come from Coca Cola Corp and instead from hundreds of others
- brigandish 4y ago> There would always be companies donating to charities and advertising - just only the ones below the threshold Below the threshold of what? How does a company get word of mouth regarding its charitable donations if their contributions are anonymous?