To be clear, we are in agreement! I'm making an argument that some limitations are worthwhile, and this doesn't make someone "against free speech" except with

To be clear, we are in agreement! I'm making an argument that some limitations are worthwhile, and this doesn't make someone "against free speech" except with the most extreme absolutist interpretation. EDIT: I misread the indentation on mobile-- I thought this was a direct reply to me. My mistake!