5 ms·

So, they did it due to commercial reasons, not legal reasons? I assume they judged the commercial repercussions and decided keeping the content was a negative.

So, they did it due to commercial reasons, not legal reasons? I assume they judged the commercial repercussions and decided keeping the content was a negative. Why do you think they should host it anyway?

Minor49er 4y ago
They didn't host the content, though. They were only providing DDoS protection
- doliveira 4y ago
  Tomato, tomato. And in this case, Cloudflare does proxy and cache traffic through its infrastructure, that's their whole business model.
  - Minor49er 4y ago
    Tomato, tomato? There's a very big difference between a hosting provider and a caching service
    - doliveira 4y ago
      In terms of political, public and commercial repercussions, which is what the discussion is about? Not much difference at all.
      - Minor49er 4y ago
        I'm glad you'll keep that in mind so you can describe these entities correctly in the future