16 ms·
That is not an expansion. Founders understood freedom of speech to be a “natural” right, not a “positive” or “negative” right.
by junofan 4y ago
That is not an expansion. Founders understood freedom of speech to be a “natural” right, not a “positive” or “negative” right.
- ellen364 4y agoMy understanding is the founding fathers believed in a combination of “natural” and “positive” rights. In that context, “positive” rights were things the government had to provide, like a jury trial. “Natural” rights were things you could do without a government, like speaking and writing, but that could still be limited by law. As an example, the 1798 Sedition Act restricted criticism of the government. That was just 7 years after the ratification of the First Amendment.