2 ms·
IMO we're pretty far off from building a single model that can generate a whole film at the press of a button. But I think a more interesting distinction is a
by joeld42 4y ago
IMO we're pretty far off from building a single model that can generate a whole film at the press of a button.
But I think a more interesting distinction is a model that allows a human to generate professional quality without spending the time or skill it used to take. We've got most of the building blocks -- a language model could generate a 3 act summary, could go from a description of a scene to the text of it, can go from a text description of a character to an image, from an image to a 3d models, etc.
Every step needs human intervention and curation, but the difference is it can be done by anyone. As the tools get better they get more control. I think in under a year, anyone will be able to create a 30-page graphic novel that is indistinguishable from human created work without close inspection. It will still take a lot of time and creative energy but they will not need to have an art or writing background.
In 5 years, creating a pixar level feature animated film will still take a lot of work, but it will be achievable by, say, a high school movie-making club over the course of a semester, rather than needing a studio of hundreds of specialists over two years.
- rcarr 4y ago> I think in under a year, anyone will be able to create a 30-page graphic novel that is indistinguishable from human created work without close inspection. I don’t even think you will be able to distinguish with close inspection. There’s already been AI generated artwork submitted to art competitions without informing the judges of its origin that has gone on to win the competition.