3 ms·
> You haven't signed any agreement with Google for search services. Literally on absolutely every google search page: https://policies.google.com/terms https:/
by deelly 4y ago
> You haven't signed any agreement with Google for search services.
Literally on absolutely every google search page:
https://policies.google.com/terms https://policies.google.com/terms
No one read terms and conditions, yes?
- westurner 4y agoTerms of Service: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service Statute of Frauds applies to agreements regarding amounts over $500. Is this a conscionable agreement between which identified parties? Does what satisfy chain of custody requirements for criminal or civil admissability if the data is from not a trustless system but a centralized trustful system? "Victory! Ruling in hiQ v. Linkedin Protects Scraping of Public Data" (2019) https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/09/victory-ruling-hiq-v-linkedin-protects-scraping-public-data https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/09/victory-ruling-hiq-v-l... And then the interplay between a "Right to be Forgotten" and the community legal obligation to retain for lawful investigative law enforcement purposes. They don't know what they want: easy investigations, compromisable investigations, privacy