4 ms·
All those topics are unimpressive? I’ve spent quite a bit of time trying to teach myself them. I’ve seen several Stanford courses (e.g CS229) so the low cours
by melling 4y ago
All those topics are unimpressive? I’ve spent quite a bit of time trying to teach myself them.
I’ve seen several Stanford courses (e.g CS229) so the low course number of 168 would seem to indicate that it’s taken within the first couple years of college.
- UncleMeat 4y agoAt Stanford, 100 level courses are intended for undergraduates while 200 level courses are intended for mixed undergrad/grad. 100 doesn't necessarily indicate freshman/sophomore.
- UmbertoNoEco 4y agothey are not; this is classic hn posturing at the veryleast this would belong to a second or third class of algorithms for ug( after the usual meat and potatoes: big,small o notation, searching and sorting, dp, greedy algorithms and so on) depending on the difficulty of the assignments this could be easily a graduate course remember that no matter how difficult, obscure or new a technical field is you will have people here claiming they took a class about it as a freshman 10 years ago and they wrote some papers about it. sometimes it may be true, but most of the time it isnt
- Hermitian 4y agoThe course description states that this is intended for senior as a capstone course, hopefully that help clarifies.