2 ms·
Not only this, but every time it happens I have to wonder how it is that designers have never tried to actually use the scrollbar, getting to the bottom only to
by nonameiguess 4y ago
Not only this, but every time it happens I have to wonder how it is that designers have never tried to actually use the scrollbar, getting to the bottom only to have it double in length, the placekeeper jumps out from underneath your cursor, the scrollbar then detects your cursor, and bam, you just skipped half the content without meaning to and it is virtually impossible to get back to where you were. This gets even worse when it isn't a list of entries you're reading but a single very long article or comment thread that should have just been paginated to begin with. It seems entirely motivated by a basic laziness of not wanting to create separate mobile and non-mobile views and defaulting everything to mobile-friendly even if it destroys the browsing experience of people using ordinary desktops and laptops.
- spookthesunset 4y agoNot maintaining a separate site for mobile and desktop isn’t lazy. Having two separate interfaces is not at all easy and it has its own set of trade offs. For example with two sites you now have two URLs and need to figure out which experience a browser should actually see. If I’m on a desktop and somebody sends me a mobile link, which page should I see?