4 ms·
FWIW, low-light performance has significantly improved in the last couple of m43 generations. My G9 (with a sufficiently wide-open prime) gets shots that my G7
by eropple 4y ago
FWIW, low-light performance has significantly improved in the last couple of m43 generations. My G9 (with a sufficiently wide-open prime) gets shots that my G7 and GH4 never had a chance for, and while the GH6 isn't great as a stills camera I expect to see even better for the photo-focused cameras using that sensor.
- bayindirh 4y agoI understand, and certainly support improvement in every size and family. However, when you're trying to shoot movement with 1/60, f/2 @ ISO10K, nothing smaller than FF cuts it. It's almost pitch dark and flash is strictly prohibited.
- Gravityloss 4y agoAn F/1 25 mm m43 lens would capture the same photons as an F/2 50 mm full frame one. Certainly an F/1 level m43 lens is a lot harder to find, I'm only aware of fixed focal length manual focus unstabilized ones...
- bayindirh 4y agoHowever, the noise floor on these m43 sensors are nowhere near the full frame counterparts, unfortunately. Getting same resolution requires much smaller pixels, too. I love more compact systems, but we can’t bend physics, for now.