2 ms·
> I'd rather they spend the money on a ballot initiative that says they have a certain amount of time to reject a permit, and it simply issues (with a refund of
by wahern 4y ago
> I'd rather they spend the money on a ballot initiative that says they have a certain amount of time to reject a permit, and it simply issues (with a refund of the permit processing fees) if the deadline passes.
I'm not very familiar with the specifics, but AFAIU the most important municipalities in the state enjoy so-called "Home Rule" under the California Constitution. I believe that means that a self-executing rule such as you've proposed is unconstitutional. Rather, somewhat like the constraints imposed on the Federal government viz-a-viz the states, the state government is often limited to cajoling municipalities through expenditures, budgeting, and law suits.
- dillondoyle 4y agoCities can have ballot initiatives. Just quick search first link on san fran info below. There are usually arcane rules. Sometimes things have to get put on by council sometimes cities allow citizen petitions. Something that changes the charter/constitution versus just an ordinance or a tax/levy. And sadly activist judges can have too large of a say imho. https://sfelections.sfgov.org/measures https://sfelections.sfgov.org/measures