She should remove testimony of what happened by the alleged victim's mother, because the accusation did not result in a conviction? It is also immediately follo

She should remove testimony of what happened by the alleged victim's mother, because the accusation did not result in a conviction? It is also immediately followed by > David was afraid the incident would blow up, since the students claimed to the police that my son had assaulted them—not the other way around. giving the reader testimony of all parties involved. But by your logic, the media could report only on court decisions.