3 ms·
Yep, it gets faces mostly right, but as they say, the devil's in the details. Eyes in particular don't seem to have clearly delineated concentric circles for ir
by SturgeonsLaw 4y ago
Yep, it gets faces mostly right, but as they say, the devil's in the details. Eyes in particular don't seem to have clearly delineated concentric circles for irises and pupils, instead they are often rendered as a "swirl".
Example image directly from Stable Diffusion:
https://i.imgur.com/XSk8fIv.png https://i.imgur.com/XSk8fIv.png
And here is that image run through GFPGAN:
https://i.imgur.com/I53AGmh.png https://i.imgur.com/I53AGmh.png
Interesting to note how specialised GFPGAN is, as some of the other details (flowers, hair) seem to be worse in the processed image. I plan to finish this image by manually blending the best of both pictures.
- userbinator 4y agoIronically, that almost looks like the sort of fantasy image you'd find as GPU box art many years ago.