4 ms·
No, it is not. The state can withhold funding if they don’t fill quotas. And cities can be sued. Cities would rather pay the fine that be subjugated under the t
by jelliclesfarm 4y ago
No, it is not. The state can withhold funding if they don’t fill quotas. And cities can be sued. Cities would rather pay the fine that be subjugated under the thumb of regional governance. The only reason it seems like this goat rodeo is legal is because the elected representatives are pirates and there is no local governance in California. Now that must be challenged and Sacramento must be sued for playing dictator for the entire state when not everyone voted for the clowns running the show.
- shuckles 4y agoAre you aware that land use authority is delegated to cities by the state and can be un-delegated if the state so chooses? What are you going to do, secede from California? Good luck.
- jelliclesfarm 4y agoAnd that’s the problem. Local governance is lacking in California and the trust in regional governance is being eroded due to the abuse of the political system. Why should part of California secede? We are still a democracy. That’s why we should vote on this. Otherwise it’s taxation without representation and that should be illegal. It’s about time we put an end to this conversion attempt to communist regime in CA.
- shuckles 4y agoLetting people do what they want with their own property isn’t communist, and the YIMBY platform polls very well statewide.
- rjbwork 4y ago"Letting people own private property and engage in usus, fructus, and abusus as they so choose is communism." That was absolutely hilarious. I really love finding me a "communism is when capitalism" out in the wild.
- jelliclesfarm 4y agoDo you have any numbers?