4 ms·
It can’t. :) Well, I kid a bit. I’ve seen it produce some amazing results, but, generally, it has a hard time with that. Often faces end up looking blurry or h
by zenlikethat 4y ago
It can’t. :)
Well, I kid a bit. I’ve seen it produce some amazing results, but, generally, it has a hard time with that. Often faces end up looking blurry or having these creepy, dead white eyes. Hands likewise often end up malformed (seven fingers anyone?) and twisty. But, it seems to have a much easier time generating passable faces in close ups with the right key words. Especially if you give it an input image that already has a clear one. It also seems to have an easier time doing faces it already knows like a celebrity, presumably because it’s using a strong existing influence instead of inventing/hallucinating it.
Supposedly this is improved in their new 1.5 version which is in beta. The software is so compelling that I suspect this will be improved quite quickly. Also, I think either way workarounds will emerge, either by composing with other networks/software (some UIs have GANs for face correction) or the old fashioned way by photoshopping over the blemishes.
- MattRix 4y agoIt’s worth noting you also get MUCH better faces and hands if you’re willing to run it for more steps (100-150). It takes a lot longer to run it at higher step counts so a lot of people don’t do it.