3 ms·

What is the benefit of moving on to a new repository? It's not like Git would have a performance problem with thousands of small text files, and it's just as ea

What is the benefit of moving on to a new repository? It's not like Git would have a performance problem with thousands of small text files, and it's just as easy to organize (actually much easier) within a single root than within multiple roots.

samsquire 4y ago
I am adding to my journal every day. If someone checks my journal on Monday, unless they scroll to the bottom to check for new journal entries on Tuesday, they shall miss the journal entries I added Tuesday. (Unless they come back but I feel I have one chance to gain a regular reader) I submit to HN when I reach a new batch of 100-300 entries. I don't want people to not see the new entries. I only tweak or add to older journal repositories, I don't add new entries to the bottom of those repositories.
- abrax3141 4y ago
  Hunh??? (Also, why would anyone want to read anyone else’s personal journal, I mean, I guess if you were Donald Trump it might be “interesting”. But if there were more than, like, three of these that I followed, I’d be reading personal journals more than doing anything else. I barely have time to follow podcasts that drop once a month, much less the random musings of random hackers.)
  - samsquire 4y ago
    I see my journal of ideas as a blog. I just happen to use GitHub and it is formatted as a journal. I am always looking for high quality things to read. So I'm interested in other people's blogs such as Joel on Software or Jeff Atwood or Joe Duffy. If you don't find it interesting then you are not the intended audience.
    - abrax3141 4y ago
      Oh. I see. Yes, framing this as using GitHub as a (micro)blogging platform makes it make much more sense (at least to me).
- mattmanser 4y ago
  Your submissions have all been marked as spam and no-one ever saw them (they're all [dead]). I think it's because you put a number in your titles so they all looked like blog spam articles '100 ways to improve you sex life'

samsquire 4y ago

I am adding to my journal every day. If someone checks my journal on Monday, unless they scroll to the bottom to check for new journal entries on Tuesday, they shall miss the journal entries I added Tuesday. (Unless they come back but I feel I have one chance to gain a regular reader) I submit to HN when I reach a new batch of 100-300 entries. I don't want people to not see the new entries. I only tweak or add to older journal repositories, I don't add new entries to the bottom of those repositories.

abrax3141 4y ago
Hunh??? (Also, why would anyone want to read anyone else’s personal journal, I mean, I guess if you were Donald Trump it might be “interesting”. But if there were more than, like, three of these that I followed, I’d be reading personal journals more than doing anything else. I barely have time to follow podcasts that drop once a month, much less the random musings of random hackers.)
- samsquire 4y ago
  I see my journal of ideas as a blog. I just happen to use GitHub and it is formatted as a journal. I am always looking for high quality things to read. So I'm interested in other people's blogs such as Joel on Software or Jeff Atwood or Joe Duffy. If you don't find it interesting then you are not the intended audience.
  - abrax3141 4y ago
    Oh. I see. Yes, framing this as using GitHub as a (micro)blogging platform makes it make much more sense (at least to me).
mattmanser 4y ago
Your submissions have all been marked as spam and no-one ever saw them (they're all [dead]). I think it's because you put a number in your titles so they all looked like blog spam articles '100 ways to improve you sex life'