2 ms·
> It sounds to me like you went down the Web Components path and became very disillusioned. It sounds to me that all you can offer is demagoguery > My goal is
by dmitriid 4y ago
> It sounds to me like you went down the Web Components path and became very disillusioned.
It sounds to me that all you can offer is demagoguery
> My goal is to keep things simple. That's why I refuse to use React, Redux, Node, Gulp, Babel, blah, blah, build pipeline.
Does it have anything to do with the question I asked? No.
- michaelwww 4y ago> Does it have anything to do with the question I asked? No. This thread is on a post about React. I'm not even sure what you want from me at this point. To prove that Web Components are better than React because I said React is tired and Web Components are wired? The "The self-fulfilling prophecy of React" article says React is tired. > It sounds to me that all you can offer is demagoguery I'm not trying to persuade anyone of anything. I'm saying I like Web Components. I haven't built a start up around them. I'm sure they fall short in many use cases.
- dmitriid 4y ago> This thread is on a post about React. This particular thread started when I replied to your claim about Web Components. I posited a simple question: have the problems listed at the link been solved? You spent an inordinate mount of time and words to avoid giving an answer. Hint: the anser is "no". > I'm not even sure what you want from me at this point. At this point? Nothing. About three replies ago I was still expected a clear honest answer.