3 ms·

For the record, I didn't attack Rich Harris. I admire him. I said he was a fast talker with strong opinions and then "I like Harris' passion. He believes his wa

For the record, I didn't attack Rich Harris. I admire him. I said he was a fast talker with strong opinions and then "I like Harris' passion. He believes his way is the best. More power to him." It sounds to me like you went down the Web Components path and became very disillusioned. That's good to know. Maybe my enthusiasm is misplaced. My goal is to keep things simple. That's why I refuse to use React, Redux, Node, Gulp, Babel, blah, blah, build pipeline. I'm not building a Facebook clone. That's not simple. We have different goals then. That's fine. Thanks for the info.

dmitriid 4y ago
> It sounds to me like you went down the Web Components path and became very disillusioned. It sounds to me that all you can offer is demagoguery > My goal is to keep things simple. That's why I refuse to use React, Redux, Node, Gulp, Babel, blah, blah, build pipeline. Does it have anything to do with the question I asked? No.
- michaelwww 4y ago
  > Does it have anything to do with the question I asked? No. This thread is on a post about React. I'm not even sure what you want from me at this point. To prove that Web Components are better than React because I said React is tired and Web Components are wired? The "The self-fulfilling prophecy of React" article says React is tired. > It sounds to me that all you can offer is demagoguery I'm not trying to persuade anyone of anything. I'm saying I like Web Components. I haven't built a start up around them. I'm sure they fall short in many use cases.
  - dmitriid 4y ago
    > This thread is on a post about React. This particular thread started when I replied to your claim about Web Components. I posited a simple question: have the problems listed at the link been solved? You spent an inordinate mount of time and words to avoid giving an answer. Hint: the anser is "no". > I'm not even sure what you want from me at this point. At this point? Nothing. About three replies ago I was still expected a clear honest answer.

dmitriid 4y ago

> It sounds to me like you went down the Web Components path and became very disillusioned. It sounds to me that all you can offer is demagoguery > My goal is to keep things simple. That's why I refuse to use React, Redux, Node, Gulp, Babel, blah, blah, build pipeline. Does it have anything to do with the question I asked? No.

michaelwww 4y ago
> Does it have anything to do with the question I asked? No. This thread is on a post about React. I'm not even sure what you want from me at this point. To prove that Web Components are better than React because I said React is tired and Web Components are wired? The "The self-fulfilling prophecy of React" article says React is tired. > It sounds to me that all you can offer is demagoguery I'm not trying to persuade anyone of anything. I'm saying I like Web Components. I haven't built a start up around them. I'm sure they fall short in many use cases.
- dmitriid 4y ago
  > This thread is on a post about React. This particular thread started when I replied to your claim about Web Components. I posited a simple question: have the problems listed at the link been solved? You spent an inordinate mount of time and words to avoid giving an answer. Hint: the anser is "no". > I'm not even sure what you want from me at this point. At this point? Nothing. About three replies ago I was still expected a clear honest answer.