> Apple, the industry leading expert of UX, didn't have copy/paste in iOS for years. Compelling evidence that copy/paste is too complicated for people, right? T

> Apple, the industry leading expert of UX, didn't have copy/paste in iOS for years. Compelling evidence that copy/paste is too complicated for people, right? Then one day they added copy/paste, I guess the nature of people changed over night and Apple merely responded to this new tolerance for complexity. They're the experts, after all. > Or maybe, [tech company] not implementing [feature] isn't good evidence for that feature being undesirable to the public. Not sure Google burying advanced search is a good analogy here since Google once used to make advanced search easily accessible from the main page. In fact, they still do depending on your user agent. Case in point: Wayback Machine's view from today. https://web.archive.org/web/20220909000247/https://www.google.com/ https://web.archive.org/web/20220909000247/https://www.googl... The fact that its appearance is variable would seem to suggest it's a very deliberate decision to determine whether to surface it, unlike Apple just trying to force its own worldview.