3 ms·
Found this article lacking. If you read a previous HN thread you probably got more of both sides of the conflict. This doesn't go into any more depth or provid
by epakai 4y ago
Found this article lacking. If you read a previous HN thread you probably got more of both sides of the conflict.
This doesn't go into any more depth or provide sources for the claims of bad activity on KF. I don't say this to defend them, but because I want the choice to punish them to be obvious, and so far its been a bunch of "somebody said" without clear evidence leading to the conclusion. I had hopes if Ars was writing on it they would go in depth and provide that clarity, but it is a surface level look.
Specifically I want to see evidence that ties KF users directly to the real world harassment. All I've seen so far indicates they were a very disgusting audience for those activities and therefore encouraged the continued harassment.