3 ms·
Sigh... so you just couldn't bear to read the second half of what I wrote? It wasn't a long post. It really wasn't. > I agree that in this case hacker news sho
by adgar 15y ago
Sigh... so you just couldn't bear to read the second half of what I wrote? It wasn't a long post. It really wasn't.
> I agree that in this case hacker news should be higher and that this is a bug. But just because hacker news is called that doesn't mean that query might feasibly be better served by another site. To assert otherwise is pretty surprising.
- dextorious 15y agoI read it. I just wanted to get the actual point across. The actual point being not the hypothetical, but this particular case. Also, doesn't your "second half" misses a "not"? Like: """But just because hacker news is called that doesn't mean that query might NOT feasibly be better served by another site. To assert otherwise is pretty surprising"".