You introduced inflation as a straw man only so that you could attack it. Now you have doubled down twice on your fallacious reasoning, as well as adding to it

You introduced inflation as a straw man only so that you could attack it. Now you have doubled down twice on your fallacious reasoning, as well as adding to it a few ad hominem attacks. Your reasoning is now dually fallacious, and your dually fallacious argument remains unconvincing.