4 ms·
Yes, but my point is that "transferring money to someone" is not a true crime. It doesn't have a victim. And yes, our governments should use military/diplomatic
by thegrimmest 4y ago
Yes, but my point is that "transferring money to someone" is not a true crime. It doesn't have a victim. And yes, our governments should use military/diplomatic channels to fight terrorism directly - that's what they're for.
- PuppyTailWags 4y ago> Yes, but my point is that "transferring money to someone" is not a true crime. It doesn't have a victim. This is also incorrect. Transferring money to a terrorist organization is a crime because countries have declared it illegal. Of course well-funded terrorists have victims and enablement of well-funded terrorism has clear victims. And yes, the government is using military and diplomatic channels to fight terrorism directly-- by ensuring the resources they have access to are limited.