3 ms·
Winamp may be an unfair comparison. I'm not overly familiar with that period's iTunes, but I remember when I bought my first iPod, a 4th gen click wheel (don't
by vladvasiliu 4y ago
Winamp may be an unfair comparison.
I'm not overly familiar with that period's iTunes, but I remember when I bought my first iPod, a 4th gen click wheel (don't remember the year, but it was already an "older model" at the time) I was using Amarok on Linux on an AMD Thunderbird with 256 MB of RAM. That thing would fly. And it did more than Winamp: it had an actual DB-backed music library, iPod interface, etc.
Yet, a few years later, when I got a MacBook Pro with a dual-core CPU and 16 times the RAM, iTunes would still be painfully slow. And I don't remember it doing much more than Amarok. As a matter of fact, it was inferior on pretty much every metric I could think of.
- anthk 4y agoSimilar here. AMD Athlonb XP, Amarok, KDE3, no Arts, just Alsa and DMIX. 256MB of RAM and a Geforce2.