4 ms·
Are you trying to say web assembly is not well documented, or are you commenting on the state of tooling? It seems to me that most compiled languages can target
by MobiusHorizons 4y ago
Are you trying to say web assembly is not well documented, or are you commenting on the state of tooling? It seems to me that most compiled languages can target wasm these days (eg c, c++, zig, rust, go, .net)
The specifications are open and detailed [1]. Specifications like that can be daunting to consume if you want a place to start from instead of a complete overview of the landscape, but there are tutorials in pure web assembly if you want to get started.
[1]: https://webassembly.github.io/spec/core/text/instructions.html https://webassembly.github.io/spec/core/text/instructions.ht...
- Existenceblinks 4y agoNot tooling. I wrote 8086 assembly before so I remember the process of learning data segment / register / byte allocation / all kind of interrupt. I would choose a word "applied webassembly" (like applied physics) for knowledge that it's lacking. c, c++, zig, rust, go, .net you said fall into "already application" category to me. It's no point of webassembly like no point of assembly when we write those languages.