4 ms·
Not having nuclear meltdowns, and taking advantage of a reaction which produces significantly higher energy output aren't advantages? Welcome to opposite land.
by ajdegol 4y ago
Not having nuclear meltdowns, and taking advantage of a reaction which produces significantly higher energy output aren't advantages? Welcome to opposite land.
Tinkerbell engineering which has increased confinement time during its period of research faster than Moores law increased transistors on a chip.
It's not like we haven't achieved nuclear fusion from MCF. We have. So maybe you are trying hard to believe it's not possible when already proven.
- pfdietz 4y agoThey are advantages, but they are not significant advantages. The main problem holding back nuclear is its cost. Fusion, at least of the DT kind, makes this main problem worse.
- ncmncm 4y agoEnergy that is too difficult and expensive to capture is useless. You might as well argue for power from H-bombs. They concentrate energy even more densely than a Tokamak. What matters most, always, is cost. Things that cost more lose. Renewables, here, win.