4 ms·
I am talking about this: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-10996838 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-10996838 The way it happened doesn't really sound like classic
by herbst 4y ago
I am talking about this:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-10996838 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-10996838
The way it happened doesn't really sound like classical ergot poisoning. But who knows (but them)
- nobody9999 4y agoSure. It's possible, but as the article you linked noted: But American academic Professor Steven Kaplan, who published a book in 2008 on the Pont-Saint-Esprit incident, insists that neither ergot nor LSD could have been responsible. Ergot contamination would not, he says, have affected only one sack of grain in one bakery, as was claimed here. The outbreak would have been far more widespread. He rules out LSD on the grounds that the symptoms people suffered, though similar, do not quite fit the drug. While the "symptoms" listed is just a report from a single person nearly 60 years later are scary, as someone who took LSD dozens of times I have to agree with Professor Kaplan that the effects mentioned don't comport with my experience. That doesn't mean it didn't happen (or that the CIA wouldn't have done such a thing -- they've done much worse), but the "evidence" is pretty thin IMHO.