4 ms·
Wikipedia "works" as a non-profit but they are also 100% the Kings of deceptive marketing to get way more funding than they need to operate and blow most of it
by noirscape 4y ago
Wikipedia "works" as a non-profit but they are also 100% the Kings of deceptive marketing to get way more funding than they need to operate and blow most of it on stuff unrelated to Wikipedia or to an ever-growing endowment that supposedly already covers the site for several decades.
Source: https://www.dailydot.com/debug/wikipedia-endownemnt-fundraising/ https://www.dailydot.com/debug/wikipedia-endownemnt-fundrais... // associated HN discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27339887 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27339887
For a more practical example; I moderate a wiki project with semi-decent traffic and a decent enough reputation and our operating costs are about ~3k each year (it's like a little more than that) if the donation rounds are any indication. The donations usually occur in November and we get funded within 3 weeks. In terms of expenses, it's really hosting and a small amount of money set aside for a WMF developer (independently) to maintain our custom extensions for the site.
You don't need tons of money if you just want to stay solvent.
- jefftk 4y agoI agree with you, but this just makes the counterexample stronger. Wikipedia could be raising far less money and still successfully operate one of the biggest sites on the web.