I'm not sure I said the opposite in the article. Could you point that out? I thought I said "..We don't have to agree on stuff like politics, religion, life, t

I'm not sure I said the opposite in the article. Could you point that out? I thought I said "..We don't have to agree on stuff like politics, religion, life, the universe, or any of that. Hell, I would like it a lot better if we didn't! When I tweet something and we start up a little sidebar conversation, I get the feeling I am part of a larger community. That's what keeps me using Twitter..." In either case, the point of the article was that different communication mediums are useful for different things. Sorry -- I hope I don't sound defensive. I just was a bit confused that you took away that I wanted people to agree with on Twitter. Far from it! I am looking for office mates. Who wants a bunch of office mates that all agree on stuff? Sounds pretty boring to me. At the end of the day, yes, Twitter is what you make it. It's really cool to see how different folks use it in completely different ways.