3 ms·
Took a while to end 'stay in Mexico' had to go through courts iirc. Seems like a lot of the drilling and EPA stuff has been gummed up in courts too Interestin
by dillondoyle 4y ago
Took a while to end 'stay in Mexico' had to go through courts iirc.
Seems like a lot of the drilling and EPA stuff has been gummed up in courts too
Interesting article link below talking about Biden's push and the problem with R partisan judges.
and the potential that if an order goes too far, court is given opportunity to make a broad and lasting ruling that would limit powers. I can very easily see this happening.
https://time.com/6205771/trump-judges-biden-executive-orders-abortion/ https://time.com/6205771/trump-judges-biden-executive-orders...
- asveikau 4y agoThis is one prime example I was thinking of when I wrote the comment, but I was waiting for someone else to say it. I have vague memories of other things, like maybe some Bush orders that didn't get a swift or easy rollback with Obama ... But that was longer ago. But I think more broadly and nonpartisan, a law passed by Congress or an executive order by the president that is done when someone feels they have a mandate... Often sets broad policy for years and outlasts the mandate. More than most people understand. I think this contradicts the easy, oversimplified statement people like to make that elections don't matter and the parties and candidates are interchangable.