3 ms·
I'm not against republicanism. Your example, 'Great time to abolish the monarchy. Monarchies are fucking stupid', is not an interesting or well though-out comme
by frakkingcylons 4y ago
I'm not against republicanism. Your example, 'Great time to abolish the monarchy. Monarchies are fucking stupid', is not an interesting or well though-out comment. If that's all the effort this commenter felt like giving to this forum, then it should be down-voted.
- encryptluks2 4y ago
- pvg 4y agoThey aren't very interesting but they tend not to start flamewars and shittifying the place or needing moderation.
- encryptluks2 4y ago[flagged]
- steve_taylor 4y agoA lot of us here are coders and we appreciate concise code. Why not, then, concise arguments? Bias wrapped in fake nuance is obvious and time-wasting. "Fucking stupid" is an apt description of monarchism in this day and age.
- xeromal 4y agoIt's low effort.
- xpe 4y ago> A lot of us here are coders and we appreciate concise code. Why not, then, concise arguments? Concisely: this argument is unconvincing. > Bias wrapped in fake nuance is obvious and time-wasting. But how do you know it is "fake nuance" rather than genuine explanation? By being uncharitable?
- dang 4y agoConcision means expressing a lot of information in few tokens. Name-calling and other kinds of fulmination don't express much information.