3 ms·
"There should be one -- and preferably only one -- obvious way to do it. If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea." AFAIK there is not a
by MostAwesomeDude 15y ago
"There should be one -- and preferably only one -- obvious way to do it. If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea." AFAIK there is not a JavaScript version of Python which is fully compliant with the Python 2.6 specification.
- ronreiter 15y agoI think he meant that it would be better if the Python interpreter would be implemented in Javascript. right?
- MostAwesomeDude 15y agoYes, and I meant that it would not be better to do this in JavaScript: It's far eaiser and simpler to have a real Python interpreter be doing the heavy lifting.
- ronreiter 15y agoI think he meant that it would be better if the Python interpreter would be implemented in Javascript. right?