3 ms·
They did not decide “arbitrarily”. If you read it you’d have read the neighborhood got involved and were calling out the size, ecological impact. Current resid
by evr1isnxprt 4y ago
They did not decide “arbitrarily”. If you read it you’d have read the neighborhood got involved and were calling out the size, ecological impact.
Current residents have private property rights too. Both sides arguing in defense of their rights under the law is exactly how our “rule of law” works.
Rule of law does not give you special say over these proceedings. Clearly for good reason; you seem keen to rush ahead without considering the rights of others with an established investment under law. When you can’t you’ll call everyone else arbitrary even though an established process and precedent were utilized.
- zbrozek 4y agoThe arbitrariness is that the standards applied were the rule of a mob, not the application of objective standards.
- evr1isnxprt 4y agoHuman society is not built on objectivity. It’s built on determining a “winner”. Private property creates subjective use of property. What objective social good is coming from private monopoly and erosion of local ecology? You see arbitrariness but relative to me I see a subjective perspective. Y’all should really sit and meditate on how flimsy and quickly inverted human language semantics are. The person seeking to build the house has an objective of subjective behavior that impacts others. You don’t exist in the vacuum you can conjure in your head.