5 ms·
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Chemicals_Evaluated_as_Insecticides_and/YMJZxAEACAAJ?hl=en&kptab=sideways&gbpv=1 https://www.google.com/books/edition/Chemi
by brilee 4y ago
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Chemicals_Evaluated_as_Insecticides_and/YMJZxAEACAAJ?hl=en&kptab=sideways&gbpv=1 https://www.google.com/books/edition/Chemicals_Evaluated_as_...
Here's your data.
The "machine digitization" is referring to OCR of the PDFs and subsequent translation of archaic chemical names into SMILES strings.
disclaimer: I work on this team.
- AlbertCory 4y agoThanks. I was in Google Patent Litigation, and there was a book I wanted to see. I didn't know it was valuable; if it was, there'd be no problem buying it, but most of the time, these things were false positives. Someone in Books offered to let me come over and see it on HIS screen, because he couldn't give me the link even as a Google employee. But I guess Sciences (or GAS, or whatever it's called), got y'all to help. Good for them (and you).
- csdvrx 4y ago> Here's your data. No. It's the source. > disclaimer: I work on this team. Good then: is your research reproducible? As in, do you have some code and data somewhere that can be used to verify your results? By that, I mean to run it on the input dataset to create something that gives results similar to you GNN results for whatever testset you used (in your example, predicting the mosquito repellency of a set of molecules)