3 ms·
how does this compare to a normal JIT compiled language? Hacking on performance to Python seems really brittle
by brrrrrm 4y ago
how does this compare to a normal JIT compiled language? Hacking on performance to Python seems really brittle
- brrrrrm 4y agoTo answer the question, JavaScript is 31x faster out of the box on size 1000000 (compared to the 6x claimed in the post). 71x on 10M. bwasti@bwasti-mbp code % time python3 prime.py 78498 python3 prime.py 3.86s user 0.02s system 98% cpu 3.938 total bwasti@bwasti-mbp code % time bun prime.js 78498 bun prime.js 0.07s user 0.02s system 74% cpu 0.125 total
- zeugmasyllepsis 4y agoI was curious about node/jitless node versus python/pypy: src time node primes.js 78498 node primes.js 1.75s user 0.05s system 102% cpu 1.761 total src time node --jitless primes.js 78498 node --jitless primes.js 5.06s user 0.04s system 100% cpu 5.088 total src time python primes.py 78498 python primes.py 4.27s user 0.03s system 100% cpu 4.276 total src asdf shell python pypy3.9-7.3.9 src time python primes.py 78498 python primes.py 0.91s user 0.07s system 100% cpu 0.970 total Actually relatively on par with one another.