3 ms·
>Poor you to have to read a rational argument in a comment using history and logic Your comment above didn't actually contain any such thing. It contained a ve
by simonh 4y ago
>Poor you to have to read a rational argument in a comment using history and logic
Your comment above didn't actually contain any such thing. It contained a vestigial semblance of them too trivialised by vitriol to land a persuasive point.
>Sacarstic people are mean and don't understand how to have quality discussions.
Not always for sure, but yes that's often the case.
- BiteCode_dev 4y agoOh but this comment is part of a thread. Because comments are in a context. Like this one, from 6 hours ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32763171 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32763171