4 ms·
I think it is somewhat interesting that it remains there, apparently after many many "generations" of combining with other images. It's also interesting to con
by nerdponx 4y ago
I think it is somewhat interesting that it remains there, apparently after many many "generations" of combining with other images.
It's also interesting to consider what this image was originally "far" away from.
There are a couple of good followup threads exploring how such a thing might come about in the "latent space" of the model:
https://twitter.com/jthteo/status/1567418273628655617 https://twitter.com/jthteo/status/1567418273628655617
https://twitter.com/mattskala/status/1567300206969982979 https://twitter.com/mattskala/status/1567300206969982979
- scambier 4y agoFor me it kinda makes sense: the portrait/person is an important feature of the image, so it's heavily weighted in the generation, producing another image with that portrait/person, and so on. I find it more interesting that the visage itself is still recognizable between generations, as if it's not "any person", but a very specific visage.