The currency system is said to be a "less worse" system to organize civilization, accounting for many facets of human nature (the lazy, the hard working, the es

The currency system is said to be a "less worse" system to organize civilization, accounting for many facets of human nature (the lazy, the hard working, the essential and non-essential, etc). The way I see that is, it is a dangerous utopia (same grade than the soviet utopia) to think that currencies will flow well enough to give all households a decent living, and that only based on the "supply and demand" rule. Actually, that would be madness. What people tend to forget about currency systems: it is a set of rules made by human beings, enforced by human beings, certainly not a force of mother nature. It seems those human beings are very discret and very few, but their networks seem complex (a good start is the blackrock and vanguard funds which drive much tech industry via "their" directors). In "tech", those currency systems are extremely toxic, and they push this toxicity upon nearly the entire world: planned obsolescence and Rube Goldberg Machines (network protocols and software mostly). Why? Because, huge parts of the tech industry cannot justify __fairly__ a sustained activity. Then, rotten people do setup those previously cited "tech" scams. This is accute toxicity for the entire world. That is expected to be strongely regulated... which will bring its own set of issues, but on the overall I believe we'll get much less toxicity... because the current state is just... omg.